Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B to 81 tok/s/user and B300 lands at $0.27 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.26 — MI355X pulls ahead by 6%.

B300: $0.56 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.45. Both at 133 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, with MI355X 25% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 30–236 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 185 tok/s/user — B300 runs $0.86 per million tokens on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B while MI355X runs $0.78. MI355X is the cheaper choice by 11%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.34/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.272MI355X:$0.257
B300:$0.564MI355X:$0.453
B300:$0.865MI355X:$0.781
Concurrency
B300:~61MI355X:~41
B300:~18MI355X:~14
B300:~9MI355X:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.