All AI inference chips

MI355X vs B300

Spec-sheet and pricing comparison of AMD Instinct MI355X and NVIDIA B300 with links to continuously measured LLM inference benchmarks on identical workloads.

Spec-sheet comparison

MI355XB300MI355X / B300
Memory per chip288 GB HBM3e268 GB HBM3e1.07x
Memory bandwidth8 TB/s8 TB/s1.0x
Dense FP8 compute5,033 TFLOP/s4,500 TFLOP/s1.12x
Dense FP4 compute10,066 TFLOP/s13,500 TFLOP/s0.75x
TDP1,400 W1,200 W1.17x
Hourly rate (neocloud tier)$2.09/hr$2.52/hr0.83x
Scale-up world size8 chips8 chips1.0x

Ratios are spec-sheet values; see the live compare pages for measured deltas.

Frequently asked questions

Which has more memory, MI355X or B300?
MI355X offers 288 GB HBM3e per chip versus 268 GB HBM3e on B300 (1.07x the capacity).
How do MI355X and B300 prices compare?
At the neocloud tier the SemiAnalysis TCO model rates MI355X at $2.09/hr versus $2.52/hr for B300. Hourly price alone is misleading; the per-dollar compare pages divide measured throughput by these rates.
Is MI355X faster than B300 for LLM inference?
On paper MI355X has 1.12x the dense FP8 compute of B300, but delivered tokens per second depend on the model, framework, precision and interactivity target. InferenceX measures both chips daily on identical workloads; see the live compare pages for current results.

See live benchmark results

Every number above is static hardware data. Delivered tokens per second, cost per million tokens and energy per token are measured continuously on the dashboard:

Go deeper with the SemiAnalysis models

InferenceX measures delivered inference performance. The SemiAnalysis institutional models cover the market behind these chips: who ships them, who buys them, and what they cost to own.