Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T · Performance per Dollar

Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T — H200 vs Jalapeño Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Only Jalapeño has cost data at 219 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T — $0.16 per million tokens. H200 is unmeasured at this target.

Jalapeño costs $0.49 per million tokens at 377 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T; we have no H200 benchmark data at this exact target.

At 536 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T, Jalapeño comes in at $0.52 per million tokens. H200 hasn't been benchmarked at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): H200 $1.22/chip/hr · Jalapeño $1.27/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T: H200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
H200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H200:—Jalapeño:$0.165
H200:—Jalapeño:$0.487
H200:—Jalapeño:$0.517
Concurrency
H200:—Jalapeño:~41
H200:—Jalapeño:~2
H200:—Jalapeño:~1