Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T · Chip comparison

Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T — H200 vs Jalapeño

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) and Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Jalapeño hits 2143 tok/s/chip for $0.16 per million tokens at 219 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. No H200 data at this operating point.

Jalapeño: 724 tok/s/chip, $0.49 per million tokens at 377 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. H200 is unmeasured here.

At 536 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T, Jalapeño delivers 682 tok/s/chip at $0.52 per million tokens; H200 hasn't been benchmarked at this target. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H200:—Jalapeño:2142.8
H200:—Jalapeño:724.5
H200:—Jalapeño:681.7
Cost ($/M tok)
H200:—Jalapeño:$0.165
H200:—Jalapeño:$0.487
H200:—Jalapeño:$0.517
tok/s/MW
H200:—Jalapeño:1904703
H200:—Jalapeño:643970
H200:—Jalapeño:605976
Concurrency
H200:—Jalapeño:~41
H200:—Jalapeño:~2
H200:—Jalapeño:~1