GLM 5/5.1 · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5/5.1 — B300 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5/5.1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push GLM 5/5.1 to 38 tok/s/user and B300 lands at $0.74 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.49 — MI355X pulls ahead by 51%.

At 60 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, B300 and MI355X land within ~1% on cost per million tokens ($1.10 vs $1.09) — call it a tie at this operating point.

Toward the upper edge of the 17–102 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 81 tok/s/user — B300 runs $1.54 per million tokens on GLM 5/5.1 while MI355X runs $1.73. B300 is the cheaper choice by 12%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.34/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5/5.1: B300 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.739MI355X:$0.491
B300:$1.102MI355X:$1.092
B300:$1.543MI355X:$1.729
Concurrency
B300:~93MI355X:~121
B300:~40MI355X:~13
B300:~21MI355X:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.