InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,834δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B Β· Chip comparison

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B β€” B200 vs B300

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Setting 82 tok/s/user as the target on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, B200 produces 63055 tok/s/chip ($0.01 per million tokens) and B300 produces 81505 ($0.01). B200 is 1% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 29% more tok/s/chip.

At 111 tok/s/user interactivity on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, B200 delivers 53999 tok/s/chip at $0.01 per million tokens; B300 delivers 65592 tok/s/chip at $0.01. B200 is 8% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 21% more tok/s/chip at this point.

B200 posts 42523 tok/s/chip for $0.01 per million tokens at 141 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B; B300 posts 50971 tok/s/chip for $0.01. B200 is 9% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 20% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:63054.5B300:81505.3
B200:53999.0B300:65591.9
B200:42523.0B300:50970.9
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.008B300:$0.008
B200:$0.009B300:$0.010
B200:$0.011B300:$0.012
tok/s/MW
B200:36874001B300:42897518
B200:31578338B300:34522039
B200:24867232B300:26826810
Concurrency
B200:~14B300:~16
B200:~12B300:~13
B200:~9B300:~10

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.