InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
StarΒ δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B Β· Chip comparison

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B β€” B200 vs B300

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Setting 85 tok/s/user as the target on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, B200 produces 62181 tok/s/chip ($0.01 per million tokens) and B300 produces 80846 ($0.01). Cost per token is essentially tied; B300 delivers 30% more tok/s/chip.

At 117 tok/s/user interactivity on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, B200 delivers 51909 tok/s/chip at $0.01 per million tokens; B300 delivers 59759 tok/s/chip at $0.01. B200 is 13% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 15% more tok/s/chip at this point.

B200 posts 38489 tok/s/chip for $0.01 per million tokens at 150 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B; B300 posts 46545 tok/s/chip for $0.01. B200 is 8% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 21% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:62181.4B300:80846.0
B200:51909.1B300:59758.9
B200:38489.2B300:46545.0
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.008B300:$0.008
B200:$0.009B300:$0.011
B200:$0.012B300:$0.013
tok/s/MW
B200:36363371B300:42550528
B200:30356183B300:31452050
B200:22508329B300:24497382
Concurrency
B200:~14B300:~16
B200:~11B300:~12
B200:~8B300:~9

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history
Run context