Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — MI355X vs RTX PRO 6000
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) and RTX PRO 6000 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
Setting 47 tok/s/user as the target on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, MI355X produces 6372 tok/s/chip ($0.07 per million tokens) and RTX PRO 6000 produces 1069 ($0.17). MI355X is 163% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 496% more tok/s/chip.
At 82 tok/s/user interactivity on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, MI355X delivers 4807 tok/s/chip at $0.09 per million tokens; RTX PRO 6000 delivers 796 tok/s/chip at $0.23. MI355X is 165% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 504% more tok/s/chip at this point.
MI355X posts 3669 tok/s/chip for $0.11 per million tokens at 118 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B; RTX PRO 6000 posts 538 tok/s/chip for $0.38. MI355X is 238% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 582% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | MI355X:6372.5RTX PRO 6000:1069.0 | MI355X:4806.8RTX PRO 6000:796.2 | MI355X:3669.4RTX PRO 6000:537.9 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | MI355X:$0.065RTX PRO 6000:$0.172 | MI355X:$0.087RTX PRO 6000:$0.230 | MI355X:$0.114RTX PRO 6000:$0.383 |
| tok/s/MW | MI355X:3049030RTX PRO 6000:1096391 | MI355X:2299906RTX PRO 6000:816652 | MI355X:1755713RTX PRO 6000:551701 |
| Concurrency | MI355X:~31RTX PRO 6000:~12 | MI355X:~13RTX PRO 6000:~5 | MI355X:~7RTX PRO 6000:~2 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.