Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · GPU comparison

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs MI300X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 posts 4619 tok/s/GPU for $0.14 per million tokens at 43 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B; MI300X posts 346 tok/s/GPU for $0.89. B300 is 528% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 1236% more tok/s/GPU.

Throughput at 53 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: B300 hits 3790 tok/s/GPU, MI300X hits 190. Per-million costs land at $0.17 and $1.63 respectively. B300 is 846% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 1899% more tok/s/GPU.

B300 / MI300X on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B at 62 tok/s/user: 3207 / 123 tok/s/GPU, $0.20 / $2.52 per million tokens. B300 is 1149% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 2513% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
B300:4618.6MI300X:345.8
B300:3789.6MI300X:189.5
B300:3206.9MI300X:122.7
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.142MI300X:$0.893
B300:$0.173MI300X:$1.633
B300:$0.201MI300X:$2.517
tok/s/MW
B300:2128409MI300X:193162
B300:1746371MI300X:105886
B300:1477819MI300X:68573
Concurrency
B300:~230MI300X:~34
B300:~153MI300X:~15
B300:~106MI300X:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.