Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs MI300X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Near the low end of the 34–71 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 43 tok/s/user — B300 runs $0.14 per million tokens on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B while MI300X runs $0.89. B300 is the cheaper choice by 528%.

On Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B at 53 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.17 for B300 and $1.63 for MI300X; B300 delivers 846% more output per dollar.

At 62 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, B300 costs $0.20 per million tokens; MI300X costs $2.52. B300 is 1149% more cost-efficient at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.34/GPU/hr · MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.142MI300X:$0.893
B300:$0.173MI300X:$1.633
B300:$0.201MI300X:$2.517
Concurrency
B300:~230MI300X:~34
B300:~153MI300X:~15
B300:~106MI300X:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.