Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T · Chip comparison

Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T — B300 vs Jalapeño

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 / Jalapeño on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T at 89 tok/s/user: 2020 / 11518 tok/s/chip, $0.31 / $0.03 per million tokens. Jalapeño is 914% cheaper per token; Jalapeño delivers 470% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 61–173 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 117 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T: B300 runs 1196 tok/s/chip at $0.52/M tokens, Jalapeño runs 9997 at $0.04/M. Jalapeño is 1387% cheaper per token; Jalapeño delivers 736% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 145 tok/s/user as the target on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T, B300 produces 585 tok/s/chip ($1.07 per million tokens) and Jalapeño produces 8213 ($0.04). Jalapeño is 2398% cheaper per token; Jalapeño delivers 1303% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:2020.3Jalapeño:11517.6
B300:1196.0Jalapeño:9997.1
B300:585.2Jalapeño:8213.2
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.311Jalapeño:$0.031
B300:$0.525Jalapeño:$0.035
B300:$1.073Jalapeño:$0.043
tok/s/MW
B300:1063329Jalapeño:10237897
B300:629472Jalapeño:8886344
B300:308005Jalapeño:7300618
Concurrency
B300:~10Jalapeño:~1112
B300:~5Jalapeño:~629
B300:~2Jalapeño:~358