Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs GB300 NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Cost-per-million is essentially even between B300 ($0.02) and GB300 NVL72 ($0.02) at 144 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B.

At 221 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, B300 and GB300 NVL72 land within ~1% on cost per million tokens ($0.03 vs $0.03) — call it a tie at this operating point.

Toward the upper edge of the 68–374 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 298 tok/s/user — B300 runs $0.11 per million tokens on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B while GB300 NVL72 runs $0.04. GB300 NVL72 is the cheaper choice by 190%. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.26/chip/hr · GB300 NVL72 $2.31/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: B300 versus GB300 NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus GB300 NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.020GB300 NVL72:$0.020
B300:$0.032GB300 NVL72:$0.032
B300:$0.114GB300 NVL72:$0.039
Concurrency
B300:~22GB300 NVL72:~53
B300:~30GB300 NVL72:~44
B300:~4GB300 NVL72:~44

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

Qwen3.5 397B 8K / 1K Cost per Million Total Tokens vs. Interactivity

Cost Tier:
Source:
SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr:

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Matching measurements exist, but their chip series are hidden.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip