Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · GPU comparison

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs GB300 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 / GB300 NVL72 on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B at 90 tok/s/user: 9770 / 6025 tok/s/GPU, $0.07 / $0.12 per million tokens. B300 is 85% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 62% more tok/s/GPU.

Around the middle of the 44–228 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 136 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: B300 runs 6823 tok/s/GPU at $0.10/M tokens, GB300 NVL72 runs 2801 at $0.26/M. B300 is 166% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 144% more tok/s/GPU.

Setting 183 tok/s/user as the target on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, B300 produces 4481 tok/s/GPU ($0.14 per million tokens) and GB300 NVL72 produces 1338 ($0.55). B300 is 292% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 235% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
B300:9770.0GB300 NVL72:6024.7
B300:6823.1GB300 NVL72:2801.0
B300:4481.0GB300 NVL72:1338.4
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.066GB300 NVL72:$0.122
B300:$0.097GB300 NVL72:$0.256
B300:$0.141GB300 NVL72:$0.553
tok/s/MW
B300:4502289GB300 NVL72:2868920
B300:3144307GB300 NVL72:1333831
B300:2064984GB300 NVL72:637343
Concurrency
B300:~26GB300 NVL72:~71
B300:~12GB300 NVL72:~21
B300:~6GB300 NVL72:~7

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: