Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T · Performance per Dollar

Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T — B300 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

On Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T at 61 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.74 for B300 and $0.70 for MI355X; MI355X delivers 6% more output per dollar.

At 79 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T, B300 costs $1.06 per million tokens; MI355X costs $0.84. MI355X is 26% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

MI355X edges B300 at 96 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T — $1.09 per million tokens versus $1.37, a 26% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.34/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T: B300 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.743MI355X:$0.699
B300:$1.055MI355X:$0.839
B300:$1.371MI355X:$1.086
Concurrency
B300:~29MI355X:~20
B300:~16MI355X:~12
B300:~10MI355X:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.