gpt-oss 120B · Performance per Dollar

gpt-oss 120B — H200 vs Jalapeño Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) on gpt-oss 120B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Jalapeño edges H200 at 137 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B — $0.01 per million tokens versus $0.07, a 1043% cost-per-token gap.

Push gpt-oss 120B to 176 tok/s/user and H200 lands at $0.09 per million tokens against Jalapeño's $0.01 — Jalapeño pulls ahead by 1362%.

H200: $0.15 per million tokens. Jalapeño: $0.01. Both at 216 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B, with Jalapeño 2052% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): H200 $1.22/chip/hr · Jalapeño $1.27/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

gpt-oss 120B: H200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
H200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H200:$0.070Jalapeño:$0.006
H200:$0.094Jalapeño:$0.006
H200:$0.147Jalapeño:$0.007
Concurrency
H200:~16Jalapeño:~1316
H200:~10Jalapeño:~828
H200:~5Jalapeño:~588