InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,908δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B Β· Chip comparison

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B β€” H200 vs Vera Rubin NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) and Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

At 96 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, H200 delivers 25435 tok/s/chip at $0.01 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 hasn't been benchmarked at this target.

H200 hits 15021 tok/s/chip for $0.02 per million tokens at 141 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. No Vera Rubin NVL72 data at this operating point.

H200: 7509 tok/s/chip, $0.05 per million tokens at 186 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Vera Rubin NVL72 is unmeasured here. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp8 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H200:25435.1Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:15021.2Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:7509.1Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
Cost ($/M tok)
H200:$0.013Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:$0.023Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:$0.045Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
tok/s/MW
H200:18565741Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:10964369Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:5481100Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
Concurrency
H200:~11Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:~8Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H200:~2Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.