InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,840δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B Β· Chip comparison

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B β€” H100 vs Vera Rubin NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) and Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

H100: 4980 tok/s/chip, $0.07 per million tokens at 46 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Vera Rubin NVL72 is unmeasured here.

At 77 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, H100 delivers 4944 tok/s/chip at $0.07 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 hasn't been benchmarked at this target.

H100 hits 4908 tok/s/chip for $0.07 per million tokens at 108 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. No Vera Rubin NVL72 data at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp8 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H100:4979.7Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:4944.2Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:4907.6Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
Cost ($/M tok)
H100:$0.065Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:$0.066Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:$0.066Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
tok/s/MW
H100:3634841Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:3608888Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:3582201Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
Concurrency
H100:~11Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:~10Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”
H100:~9Vera Rubin NVL72:β€”

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.