Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — H100 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

At 46 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, H100 comes in at $0.07 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72 hasn't been benchmarked at this operating point.

Only H100 has cost data at 77 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — $0.07 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72 is unmeasured at this target.

H100 costs $0.07 per million tokens at 108 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B; we have no Vera Rubin NVL72 benchmark data at this exact target. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): H100 $1.17/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: H100 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
H100 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H100:$0.065Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:$0.066Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:$0.066Vera Rubin NVL72:—
Concurrency
H100:~11Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:~10Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:~9Vera Rubin NVL72:—

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.