InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
StarΒ δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B Β· Chip comparison

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B β€” B300 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Throughput at 86 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: B300 hits 80846 tok/s/chip, MI355X hits 58839. Per-million costs land at $0.01 and $0.01 respectively. MI355X is 10% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 37% more tok/s/chip.

B300 / MI355X on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B at 106 tok/s/user: 67218 / 36602 tok/s/chip, $0.01 / $0.01 per million tokens. B300 is 22% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 84% more tok/s/chip.

Toward the upper edge of the 67–145 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 125 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: B300 runs 55364 tok/s/chip at $0.01/M tokens, MI355X runs 19807 at $0.02/M. B300 is 86% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 180% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:80846.0MI355X:58838.9
B300:67217.8MI355X:36602.3
B300:55364.0MI355X:19807.3
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.008MI355X:$0.007
B300:$0.009MI355X:$0.011
B300:$0.011MI355X:$0.021
tok/s/MW
B300:42550528MI355X:28152565
B300:35377769MI355X:17513060
B300:29138944MI355X:9477154
Concurrency
B300:~16MI355X:~13
B300:~14MI355X:~8
B300:~11MI355X:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history
Run context