InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,861δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Muse Spark Open 816B Β· Chip comparison

Muse Spark Open 816B β€” H100 vs H200

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) and H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on Muse Spark Open 816B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

At 48 tok/s/user interactivity on Muse Spark Open 816B, H100 delivers 1316 tok/s/chip at $0.25 per million tokens; H200 delivers 6378 tok/s/chip at $0.05. H200 is 365% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 385% more tok/s/chip at this point.

H100 posts 1316 tok/s/chip for $0.25 per million tokens at 88 tok/s/user on Muse Spark Open 816B; H200 posts 4947 tok/s/chip for $0.07. H200 is 261% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 276% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 127 tok/s/user on Muse Spark Open 816B: H100 hits 1316 tok/s/chip, H200 hits 3485. Per-million costs land at $0.25 and $0.10 respectively. H200 is 154% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 165% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H100:1315.8H200:6377.7
H100:1315.8H200:4946.5
H100:1315.8H200:3484.6
Cost ($/M tok)
H100:$0.247H200:$0.053
H100:$0.247H200:$0.069
H100:$0.247H200:$0.097
tok/s/MW
H100:960474H200:4655246
H100:960474H200:3610586
H100:960474H200:2543511
Concurrency
H100:~1H200:~14
H100:~1H200:~9
H100:~1H200:~6

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.