InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,916δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B Β· Chip comparison

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B β€” B300 vs GB200 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Near the low end of the 10–549 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 145 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B: B300 runs 61216 tok/s/chip at $0.01/M tokens, GB200 NVL72 runs 51701 at $0.01/M. GB200 NVL72 is 3% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 18% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 280 tok/s/user as the target on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B, B300 produces 22779 tok/s/chip ($0.03 per million tokens) and GB200 NVL72 produces 33217 ($0.02). GB200 NVL72 is 77% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 46% more tok/s/chip.

At 414 tok/s/user interactivity on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B, B300 delivers 9547 tok/s/chip at $0.07 per million tokens; GB200 NVL72 delivers 15524 tok/s/chip at $0.03. GB200 NVL72 is 98% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 63% more tok/s/chip at this point. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:61215.8GB200 NVL72:51701.4
B300:22778.5GB200 NVL72:33216.6
B300:9546.8GB200 NVL72:15523.8
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.010GB200 NVL72:$0.010
B300:$0.028GB200 NVL72:$0.016
B300:$0.066GB200 NVL72:$0.033
tok/s/MW
B300:32218854GB200 NVL72:27647785
B300:11988709GB200 NVL72:17762895
B300:5024651GB200 NVL72:8301522
Concurrency
B300:~40GB200 NVL72:~32
B300:~12GB200 NVL72:~19
B300:~4GB200 NVL72:~8

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.