InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,776中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

MiniMax M3 428B · Chip comparison

MiniMax M3 428B — GB200 NVL72 vs GB300 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on MiniMax M3 428B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

GB200 NVL72 posts 25751 tok/s/chip for $0.02 per million tokens at 159 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B; GB300 NVL72 posts 32568 tok/s/chip for $0.02. GB300 NVL72 is 2% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 26% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 218 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B: GB200 NVL72 hits 18678 tok/s/chip, GB300 NVL72 hits 21832. Per-million costs land at $0.03 and $0.03 respectively. GB200 NVL72 is 6% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 17% more tok/s/chip.

GB200 NVL72 / GB300 NVL72 on MiniMax M3 428B at 277 tok/s/user: 8316 / 13103 tok/s/chip, $0.06 / $0.05 per million tokens. GB300 NVL72 is 27% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 58% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
GB200 NVL72:25750.9GB300 NVL72:32567.6
GB200 NVL72:18677.9GB300 NVL72:21832.5
GB200 NVL72:8316.4GB300 NVL72:13103.4
Cost ($/M tok)
GB200 NVL72:$0.020GB300 NVL72:$0.020
GB200 NVL72:$0.028GB300 NVL72:$0.029
GB200 NVL72:$0.062GB300 NVL72:$0.049
tok/s/MW
GB200 NVL72:13770532GB300 NVL72:15362054
GB200 NVL72:9988177GB300 NVL72:10298334
GB200 NVL72:4447261GB300 NVL72:6180856
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~16GB300 NVL72:~29
GB200 NVL72:~11GB300 NVL72:~20
GB200 NVL72:~4GB300 NVL72:~24

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

MiniMax M3 428B 8K / 1K Total Tokens per $1 TCO vs. Interactivity

Cost Tier:
Owning at Large Hyperscaler Volume
Source:
SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: 3.61 1.17 1.22 1.73 2.26 1.86 2.31 0.95 1.1 1.5 0.68 1.27 1.03

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip