MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 · GPU comparison

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — B300 vs MI300X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 posts 5802 tok/s/GPU for $0.11 per million tokens at 44 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7; MI300X posts 1249 tok/s/GPU for $0.25. B300 is 122% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 365% more tok/s/GPU.

Throughput at 61 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: B300 hits 3387 tok/s/GPU, MI300X hits 779. Per-million costs land at $0.19 and $0.40 respectively. B300 is 110% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 335% more tok/s/GPU.

B300 / MI300X on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 at 78 tok/s/user: 1568 / 412 tok/s/GPU, $0.42 / $0.75 per million tokens. B300 is 77% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 281% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
B300:5802.1MI300X:1248.6
B300:3387.5MI300X:778.8
B300:1568.3MI300X:411.9
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.113MI300X:$0.250
B300:$0.192MI300X:$0.402
B300:$0.421MI300X:$0.747
tok/s/MW
B300:2673764MI300X:697553
B300:1561044MI300X:435091
B300:722720MI300X:230105
Concurrency
B300:~303MI300X:~63
B300:~232MI300X:~26
B300:~47MI300X:~11

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.