InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,928δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Kimi K3 2.8T Β· Chip comparison

Kimi K3 2.8T β€” B300 vs Vera Rubin NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Kimi K3 2.8T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Setting 127 tok/s/user as the target on Kimi K3 2.8T, B300 produces 2488 tok/s/chip ($0.25 per million tokens) and Vera Rubin NVL72 produces 39806 ($0.03). Vera Rubin NVL72 is 902% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 1500% more tok/s/chip.

At 153 tok/s/user interactivity on Kimi K3 2.8T, B300 delivers 2070 tok/s/chip at $0.30 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 34857 tok/s/chip at $0.03. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 954% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 1584% more tok/s/chip at this point.

B300 posts 2042 tok/s/chip for $0.31 per million tokens at 178 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T; Vera Rubin NVL72 posts 30624 tok/s/chip for $0.03. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 839% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 1400% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:2488.2Vera Rubin NVL72:39805.9
B300:2070.3Vera Rubin NVL72:34856.7
B300:2042.1Vera Rubin NVL72:30624.1
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.252Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.025
B300:$0.303Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.029
B300:$0.307Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.033
tok/s/MW
B300:1309602Vera Rubin NVL72:12062403
B300:1089641Vera Rubin NVL72:10562643
B300:1074802Vera Rubin NVL72:9280017
Concurrency
B300:~3Vera Rubin NVL72:~221
B300:~2Vera Rubin NVL72:~184
B300:~1Vera Rubin NVL72:~151

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.