InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,822δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Kimi K3 2.8T Β· Chip comparison

Kimi K3 2.8T β€” B300 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Kimi K3 2.8T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

B300 posts 6454 tok/s/chip for $0.10 per million tokens at 45 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T; MI355X posts 9698 tok/s/chip for $0.04. MI355X is 126% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 50% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 82 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T: B300 hits 4443 tok/s/chip, MI355X hits 4161. Per-million costs land at $0.14 and $0.10 respectively. MI355X is 41% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 7% more tok/s/chip.

B300 / MI355X on Kimi K3 2.8T at 118 tok/s/user: 3325 / 3219 tok/s/chip, $0.19 / $0.13 per million tokens. MI355X is 46% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 3% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:6453.7MI355X:9697.8
B300:4442.6MI355X:4161.4
B300:3325.2MI355X:3218.6
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.097MI355X:$0.043
B300:$0.141MI355X:$0.100
B300:$0.189MI355X:$0.129
tok/s/MW
B300:3396685MI355X:4640081
B300:2338201MI355X:1991094
B300:1750087MI355X:1540010
Concurrency
B300:~11MI355X:~20
B300:~6MI355X:~7
B300:~4MI355X:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.