InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,928δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Kimi K3 2.8T Β· Chip comparison

Kimi K3 2.8T β€” B200 vs Vera Rubin NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Kimi K3 2.8T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

At 125 tok/s/user interactivity on Kimi K3 2.8T, B200 delivers 2217 tok/s/chip at $0.22 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 40202 tok/s/chip at $0.02. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 769% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 1713% more tok/s/chip at this point.

B200 posts 1703 tok/s/chip for $0.28 per million tokens at 148 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T; Vera Rubin NVL72 posts 35774 tok/s/chip for $0.03. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 906% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 2000% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 170 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T: B200 hits 1307 tok/s/chip, Vera Rubin NVL72 hits 31907. Per-million costs land at $0.37 and $0.03 respectively. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 1070% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 2342% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:2216.9Vera Rubin NVL72:40201.7
B200:1703.4Vera Rubin NVL72:35773.7
B200:1306.8Vera Rubin NVL72:31907.2
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.217Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.025
B200:$0.282Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.028
B200:$0.368Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.031
tok/s/MW
B200:1296406Vera Rubin NVL72:12182327
B200:996165Vera Rubin NVL72:10840507
B200:764183Vera Rubin NVL72:9668851
Concurrency
B200:~6Vera Rubin NVL72:~224
B200:~4Vera Rubin NVL72:~191
B200:~3Vera Rubin NVL72:~162

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.