gpt-oss 120B · Chip comparison

gpt-oss 120B — MI300X vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on gpt-oss 120B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Setting 90 tok/s/user as the target on gpt-oss 120B, MI300X produces 5095 tok/s/chip ($0.05 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 27009 ($0.02). MI355X is 236% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 430% more tok/s/chip.

At 142 tok/s/user interactivity on gpt-oss 120B, MI300X delivers 3406 tok/s/chip at $0.08 per million tokens; MI355X delivers 16764 tok/s/chip at $0.02. MI355X is 212% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 392% more tok/s/chip at this point.

MI300X posts 1102 tok/s/chip for $0.24 per million tokens at 194 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B; MI355X posts 10948 tok/s/chip for $0.04. MI355X is 529% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 894% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
MI300X:5094.8MI355X:27008.6
MI300X:3405.7MI355X:16763.8
MI300X:1101.8MI355X:10948.1
Cost ($/M tok)
MI300X:$0.052MI355X:$0.015
MI300X:$0.077MI355X:$0.025
MI300X:$0.240MI355X:$0.038
tok/s/MW
MI300X:3665334MI355X:12922781
MI300X:2450139MI355X:8020942
MI300X:792671MI355X:5238331
Concurrency
MI300X:~13MI355X:~35
MI300X:~5MI355X:~14
MI300X:~7MI355X:~6

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Total Tokens per $1 USD (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity

gpt-oss 120B FP4 8K / 1K Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip