InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,776中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

GLM 5.3 744B · Chip comparison

GLM 5.3 744B — B200 vs GB200 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on GLM 5.3 744B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Throughput at 143 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B: B200 hits 10203 tok/s/chip, GB200 NVL72 hits 12412. Per-million costs land at $0.05 and $0.04 respectively. GB200 NVL72 is 13% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 22% more tok/s/chip.

B200 / GB200 NVL72 on GLM 5.3 744B at 195 tok/s/user: 7040 / 8529 tok/s/chip, $0.07 / $0.06 per million tokens. GB200 NVL72 is 13% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 21% more tok/s/chip.

Toward the upper edge of the 92–298 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 247 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B: B200 runs 4408 tok/s/chip at $0.11/M tokens, GB200 NVL72 runs 4946 at $0.10/M. GB200 NVL72 is 4% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 12% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:10203.2GB200 NVL72:12412.1
B200:7039.8GB200 NVL72:8528.6
B200:4408.0GB200 NVL72:4946.4
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.047GB200 NVL72:$0.042
B200:$0.068GB200 NVL72:$0.061
B200:$0.109GB200 NVL72:$0.104
tok/s/MW
B200:5966757GB200 NVL72:6637513
B200:4116854GB200 NVL72:4560734
B200:2577796GB200 NVL72:2645149
Concurrency
B200:~37GB200 NVL72:~63
B200:~8GB200 NVL72:~39
B200:~5GB200 NVL72:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.