InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,803δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

GLM 5.3 744B Β· Chip comparison

GLM 5.3 744B β€” GB300 NVL72 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5.3 744B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Near the low end of the 84–273 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 131 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B: GB300 NVL72 runs 17084 tok/s/chip at $0.04/M tokens, MI355X runs 10013 at $0.04/M. GB300 NVL72 is 11% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 71% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 178 tok/s/user as the target on GLM 5.3 744B, GB300 NVL72 produces 9392 tok/s/chip ($0.07 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 5491 ($0.08). GB300 NVL72 is 11% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 71% more tok/s/chip.

At 226 tok/s/user interactivity on GLM 5.3 744B, GB300 NVL72 delivers 5472 tok/s/chip at $0.12 per million tokens; MI355X delivers 3913 tok/s/chip at $0.11. MI355X is 10% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 40% more tok/s/chip at this point. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
GB300 NVL72:17084.2MI355X:10013.4
GB300 NVL72:9392.1MI355X:5491.2
GB300 NVL72:5472.2MI355X:3913.4
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:$0.038MI355X:$0.042
GB300 NVL72:$0.068MI355X:$0.076
GB300 NVL72:$0.117MI355X:$0.106
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:8058599MI355X:4791079
GB300 NVL72:4430250MI355X:2627356
GB300 NVL72:2581216MI355X:1872463
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~48MI355X:~6
GB300 NVL72:~47MI355X:~3
GB300 NVL72:~19MI355X:~4

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

GLM5.2/GLM5.3 744B 8K / 1K Total Tokens per $1 TCO vs. Interactivity

Cost Tier:
Owning at Large Hyperscaler Volume
Source:
SemiAnalysis InferenceXβ„’

TCO $/chip/hr: 3.61 1.17 1.22 1.73 2.26 1.86 2.31 0.95 1.1 1.5 0.68 1.27 1.03

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.

Shift+Scroll to zoom β€’ Drag to pan β€’ Double-click to reset β€’ Click a point to pin tooltip