InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,803δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

GLM 5.3 744B Β· Chip comparison

GLM 5.3 744B β€” B300 vs GB200 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on GLM 5.3 744B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

B300 / GB200 NVL72 on GLM 5.3 744B at 137 tok/s/user: 11622 / 12883 tok/s/chip, $0.05 / $0.04 per million tokens. GB200 NVL72 is 35% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 11% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 92–273 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 182 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B: B300 runs 7303 tok/s/chip at $0.09/M tokens, GB200 NVL72 runs 9703 at $0.05/M. GB200 NVL72 is 61% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 33% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 228 tok/s/user as the target on GLM 5.3 744B, B300 produces 5206 tok/s/chip ($0.12 per million tokens) and GB200 NVL72 produces 5652 ($0.09). GB200 NVL72 is 32% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 9% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:11622.0GB200 NVL72:12882.7
B300:7303.0GB200 NVL72:9703.1
B300:5205.7GB200 NVL72:5652.2
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.054GB200 NVL72:$0.040
B300:$0.086GB200 NVL72:$0.053
B300:$0.121GB200 NVL72:$0.091
tok/s/MW
B300:6116829GB200 NVL72:6889127
B300:3843703GB200 NVL72:5188833
B300:2739867GB200 NVL72:3022558
Concurrency
B300:~15GB200 NVL72:~69
B300:~10GB200 NVL72:~46
B300:~6GB200 NVL72:~6

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.