GLM 5/5.1 · GPU comparison

GLM 5/5.1 — GB300 NVL72 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5/5.1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Setting 31 tok/s/user as the target on GLM 5/5.1, GB300 NVL72 produces 3824 tok/s/GPU ($0.19 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 947 ($0.44). GB300 NVL72 is 127% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 304% more tok/s/GPU.

At 43 tok/s/user interactivity on GLM 5/5.1, GB300 NVL72 delivers 276 tok/s/GPU at $2.67 per million tokens; MI355X delivers 701 tok/s/GPU at $0.58. MI355X is 357% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 154% more tok/s/GPU at this point.

GB300 NVL72 posts 93 tok/s/GPU for $7.90 per million tokens at 55 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1; MI355X posts 417 tok/s/GPU for $0.99. MI355X is 702% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 348% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
GB300 NVL72:3824.1MI355X:946.6
GB300 NVL72:275.7MI355X:700.7
GB300 NVL72:93.2MI355X:417.5
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:$0.193MI355X:$0.438
GB300 NVL72:$2.674MI355X:$0.585
GB300 NVL72:$7.904MI355X:$0.985
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:1820984MI355X:357192
GB300 NVL72:131293MI355X:264415
GB300 NVL72:44379MI355X:157540
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~6137MI355X:~128
GB300 NVL72:~258MI355X:~40
GB300 NVL72:~67MI355X:~16

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.