InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,837δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B Β· Chip comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B β€” H200 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

H200 / MI355X on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B at 89 tok/s/user: 18300 / 107132 tok/s/chip, $0.02 / $0.00 per million tokens. MI355X is 376% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 485% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 12–320 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 166 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B: H200 runs 10342 tok/s/chip at $0.03/M tokens, MI355X runs 59466 at $0.01/M. MI355X is 368% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 475% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 243 tok/s/user as the target on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B, H200 produces 5424 tok/s/chip ($0.06 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 32580 ($0.01). MI355X is 389% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 501% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H200:18299.7MI355X:107132.3
H200:10342.0MI355X:59465.6
H200:5424.2MI355X:32580.1
Cost ($/M tok)
H200:$0.019MI355X:$0.004
H200:$0.033MI355X:$0.007
H200:$0.062MI355X:$0.013
tok/s/MW
H200:13357422MI355X:51259483
H200:7548878MI355X:28452430
H200:3959303MI355X:15588573
Concurrency
H200:~12MI355X:~32
H200:~6MI355X:~32
H200:~2MI355X:~8

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.