InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,669中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · Chip comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B — H200 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

H200 / MI355X on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B at 19 tok/s/user: 19263 / 9485 tok/s/chip, $0.02 / $0.04 per million tokens. H200 is 150% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 103% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 14–35 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 24 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B: H200 runs 19139 tok/s/chip at $0.02/M tokens, MI355X runs 6984 at $0.06/M. H200 is 237% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 174% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 30 tok/s/user as the target on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B, H200 produces 18899 tok/s/chip ($0.02 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 3578 ($0.12). H200 is 550% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 428% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H200:19262.6MI355X:9485.1
H200:19139.1MI355X:6983.9
H200:18899.5MI355X:3577.6
Cost ($/M tok)
H200:$0.018MI355X:$0.044
H200:$0.018MI355X:$0.060
H200:$0.018MI355X:$0.116
tok/s/MW
H200:14060308MI355X:4538332
H200:13970161MI355X:3341561
H200:13795237MI355X:1711792
Concurrency
H200:~55MI355X:~17
H200:~46MI355X:~10
H200:~36MI355X:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.