InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,776中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · Chip comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B — H100 vs H200

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) and H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

H100 / H200 on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B at 81 tok/s/user: 10947 / 19845 tok/s/chip, $0.03 / $0.02 per million tokens. H200 is 74% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 81% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 7–303 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 155 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B: H100 runs 6922 tok/s/chip at $0.05/M tokens, H200 runs 11019 at $0.03/M. H200 is 53% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 59% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 230 tok/s/user as the target on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B, H100 produces 4187 tok/s/chip ($0.08 per million tokens) and H200 produces 5740 ($0.06). H200 is 31% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 37% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H100:10946.7H200:19845.0
H100:6921.5H200:11018.6
H100:4187.3H200:5740.5
Cost ($/M tok)
H100:$0.030H200:$0.017
H100:$0.047H200:$0.031
H100:$0.078H200:$0.059
tok/s/MW
H100:7990287H200:14485434
H100:5052199H200:8042768
H100:3056440H200:4190122
Concurrency
H100:~15H200:~14
H100:~8H200:~6
H100:~4H200:~2

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.