InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,669中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · Chip comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B — GB200 NVL72 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

GB200 NVL72 / MI355X on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B at 19 tok/s/user: 78100 / 9485 tok/s/chip, $0.01 / $0.04 per million tokens. GB200 NVL72 is 564% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 723% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 14–35 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 24 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B: GB200 NVL72 runs 78100 tok/s/chip at $0.01/M tokens, MI355X runs 6984 at $0.06/M. GB200 NVL72 is 802% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 1018% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 30 tok/s/user as the target on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B, GB200 NVL72 produces 78100 tok/s/chip ($0.01 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 3578 ($0.12). GB200 NVL72 is 1660% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 2083% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
GB200 NVL72:78100.0MI355X:9485.1
GB200 NVL72:78100.0MI355X:6983.9
GB200 NVL72:78100.0MI355X:3577.6
Cost ($/M tok)
GB200 NVL72:$0.007MI355X:$0.044
GB200 NVL72:$0.007MI355X:$0.060
GB200 NVL72:$0.007MI355X:$0.116
tok/s/MW
GB200 NVL72:41764704MI355X:4538332
GB200 NVL72:41764704MI355X:3341561
GB200 NVL72:41764704MI355X:1711792
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~64MI355X:~17
GB200 NVL72:~64MI355X:~10
GB200 NVL72:~64MI355X:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.