InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,776中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · Chip comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B — B200 vs MI325X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Near the low end of the 10–215 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 61 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B: B200 runs 91113 tok/s/chip at $0.01/M tokens, MI325X runs 15608 at $0.02/M. B200 is 271% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 484% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 112 tok/s/user as the target on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B, B200 produces 59674 tok/s/chip ($0.01 per million tokens) and MI325X produces 9279 ($0.03). B200 is 309% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 543% more tok/s/chip.

At 164 tok/s/user interactivity on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B, B200 delivers 49478 tok/s/chip at $0.01 per million tokens; MI325X delivers 4124 tok/s/chip at $0.07. B200 is 663% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 1100% more tok/s/chip at this point. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:91112.9MI325X:15608.2
B200:59674.5MI325X:9279.5
B200:49478.4MI325X:4124.2
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.005MI325X:$0.020
B200:$0.008MI325X:$0.033
B200:$0.010MI325X:$0.074
tok/s/MW
B200:53282403MI325X:9235634
B200:34897350MI325X:5490810
B200:28934723MI325X:2440359
Concurrency
B200:~64MI325X:~6
B200:~50MI325X:~2
B200:~13MI325X:~1

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.