InferenceX🎃bySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star 中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T · Chip comparison

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T — GB300 NVL72 vs Vera Rubin NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

GB300 NVL72 posts 71122 tok/s/chip for $0.01 per million tokens at 130 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T; Vera Rubin NVL72 posts 255517 tok/s/chip for $0.00. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 130% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 259% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 187 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T: GB300 NVL72 hits 13202 tok/s/chip, Vera Rubin NVL72 hits 136274. Per-million costs land at $0.05 and $0.01 respectively. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 561% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 932% more tok/s/chip.

GB300 NVL72 / Vera Rubin NVL72 on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T at 243 tok/s/user: 5685 / 4625 tok/s/chip, $0.11 / $0.22 per million tokens. GB300 NVL72 is 92% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 23% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
GB300 NVL72:71121.8Vera Rubin NVL72:255516.7
GB300 NVL72:13201.6Vera Rubin NVL72:136274.4
GB300 NVL72:5685.3Vera Rubin NVL72:4625.1
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:$0.009Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.004
GB300 NVL72:$0.049Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.007
GB300 NVL72:$0.113Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.217
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:33548002Vera Rubin NVL72:77429317
GB300 NVL72:6227165Vera Rubin NVL72:41295259
GB300 NVL72:2681731Vera Rubin NVL72:1401538
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~325Vera Rubin NVL72:~2737
GB300 NVL72:~32Vera Rubin NVL72:~1213
GB300 NVL72:~1Vera Rubin NVL72:~19

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history
Run context