InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,821δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T Β· Chip comparison

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T β€” B300 vs GB300 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

B300 / GB300 NVL72 on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T at 90 tok/s/user: 21708 / 88840 tok/s/chip, $0.03 / $0.01 per million tokens. GB300 NVL72 is 300% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 309% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 25–284 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 155 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T: B300 runs 6876 tok/s/chip at $0.09/M tokens, GB300 NVL72 runs 20218 at $0.03/M. GB300 NVL72 is 188% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 194% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 220 tok/s/user as the target on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T, B300 produces 3781 tok/s/chip ($0.17 per million tokens) and GB300 NVL72 produces 5755 ($0.11). GB300 NVL72 is 49% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 52% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:21707.6GB300 NVL72:88839.8
B300:6876.3GB300 NVL72:20218.1
B300:3780.6GB300 NVL72:5754.6
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.029GB300 NVL72:$0.007
B300:$0.091GB300 NVL72:$0.032
B300:$0.166GB300 NVL72:$0.112
tok/s/MW
B300:11425049GB300 NVL72:41905567
B300:3619125GB300 NVL72:9536841
B300:1989779GB300 NVL72:2714439
Concurrency
B300:~30GB300 NVL72:~515
B300:~8GB300 NVL72:~83
B300:~4GB300 NVL72:~11

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1.6T 8K / 1K Total Tokens per $1 TCO vs. Interactivity

Cost Tier:
Owning at Large Hyperscaler Volume
Source:
SemiAnalysis InferenceXβ„’

TCO $/chip/hr: 3.61 1.17 1.22 1.73 2.26 1.86 2.31 0.95 1.1 1.5 0.68 1.27 1.03

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Matching measurements exist, but their chip series are hidden.

Shift+Scroll to zoom β€’ Drag to pan β€’ Double-click to reset β€’ Click a point to pin tooltip