InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
StarΒ δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesHardware ResultsWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T Β· Chip comparison

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T β€” B200 vs Vera Rubin NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

At 129 tok/s/user interactivity on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T, B200 delivers 22787 tok/s/chip at $0.02 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 256644 tok/s/chip at $0.00. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 440% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 1026% more tok/s/chip at this point.

B200 posts 9035 tok/s/chip for $0.05 per million tokens at 185 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T; Vera Rubin NVL72 posts 142100 tok/s/chip for $0.01. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 654% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 1473% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 240 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T: B200 hits 3989 tok/s/chip, Vera Rubin NVL72 hits 4903. Per-million costs land at $0.12 and $0.20 respectively. B200 is 70% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 23% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:22786.6Vera Rubin NVL72:256643.8
B200:9034.6Vera Rubin NVL72:142100.1
B200:3989.4Vera Rubin NVL72:4903.3
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.021Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.004
B200:$0.053Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.007
B200:$0.120Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.205
tok/s/MW
B200:13325510Vera Rubin NVL72:77770858
B200:5283404Vera Rubin NVL72:43060633
B200:2332981Vera Rubin NVL72:1485860
Concurrency
B200:~56Vera Rubin NVL72:~2749
B200:~12Vera Rubin NVL72:~1288
B200:~4Vera Rubin NVL72:~21

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history
Run context