DeepSeek R1 — GB300 NVL72 vs MI300X
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on DeepSeek R1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
At 95 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, GB300 NVL72 delivers 12350 tok/s/chip at $0.05 per million tokens; MI300X hasn't been benchmarked at this target.
GB300 NVL72 hits 4744 tok/s/chip for $0.14 per million tokens at 167 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1. No MI300X data at this operating point.
GB300 NVL72: 961 tok/s/chip, $0.67 per million tokens at 240 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1. MI300X is unmeasured here. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | GB300 NVL72:12350.5MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:4743.7MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:961.3MI300X:— |
| Cost ($/M tok) | GB300 NVL72:$0.052MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:$0.135MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:$0.667MI300X:— |
| tok/s/MW | GB300 NVL72:5825707MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:2237582MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:453449MI300X:— |
| Concurrency | GB300 NVL72:~690MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:~181MI300X:— | GB300 NVL72:~23MI300X:— |
Inference Performance
Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.
Total Tokens per $1 USD (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity
DeepSeek R1 0528 671B • FP4 • 8K / 1K • Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™
TCO $/chip/hr: H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68
Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
No data available
Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.
Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip