GLM 5.3 744B · MI355X · Precision Comparison

MI355X: FP4 vs FP8 Precision Comparison

How FP4 and FP8 precision affect GLM 5.3 744B inference on MI355X (AMD CDNA 4). Throughput, latency, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 522 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B (MI355X), FP8 delivers 198 tok/s/chip at $2.11 per million tokens; FP4 hasn't been benchmarked at this target. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence or model in the controls. Each side uses the best available serving configuration for that precision, which may include speculative decoding such as MTP where recipes exist — the same convention as the other comparison pages.)

GLM 5.3 744B: FP4 versus FP8 throughput and cost at matched interactivity levels on MI355X
FP4 versus FP8 throughput and cost per million tokens on MI355X for this comparison's canonical default workload.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
FP4:—FP8:197.8
Cost ($/M tok)
FP4:—FP8:$2.106
tok/s/MW
FP4:—FP8:94648
Concurrency
FP4:—FP8:~1

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config