Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — MI355X vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Vera Rubin NVL72 edges MI355X at 86 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — $0.00 per million tokens versus $0.01, a 78% cost-per-token gap.

Push Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B to 106 tok/s/user and MI355X lands at $0.01 per million tokens against Vera Rubin NVL72's $0.00 — Vera Rubin NVL72 pulls ahead by 167%.

MI355X: $0.02 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72: $0.00. Both at 125 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, with Vera Rubin NVL72 360% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI355X $1.50/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: MI355X versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI355X versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI355X:$0.007Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.004
MI355X:$0.011Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.004
MI355X:$0.021Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.005
Concurrency
MI355X:~13Vera Rubin NVL72:~207
MI355X:~8Vera Rubin NVL72:~234
MI355X:~5Vera Rubin NVL72:~239

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config