Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — B200 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Push Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B to 86 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.01 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.01 — MI355X pulls ahead by 10%.

B200: $0.01 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.01. Both at 106 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, with B200 32% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 67–145 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 125 tok/s/user — B200 runs $0.01 per million tokens on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B while MI355X runs $0.02. B200 is the cheaper choice by 114%. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.73/chip/hr · MI355X $1.50/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.008MI355X:$0.007
B200:$0.009MI355X:$0.011
B200:$0.010MI355X:$0.021
Concurrency
B200:~14MI355X:~13
B200:~12MI355X:~8
B200:~10MI355X:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config