Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs MI325X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

On Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B at 46 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.15 for B300 and $0.86 for MI325X; B300 delivers 472% more output per dollar.

At 55 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, B300 costs $0.18 per million tokens; MI325X costs $1.63. B300 is 811% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

B300 edges MI325X at 64 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — $0.21 per million tokens versus $2.64, a 1170% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.34/GPU/hr · MI325X $1.28/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.151MI325X:$0.864
B300:$0.179MI325X:$1.631
B300:$0.208MI325X:$2.638
Concurrency
B300:~205MI325X:~37
B300:~140MI325X:~16
B300:~99MI325X:~9

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.