Muse Spark Open 816B · Performance per Dollar

Muse Spark Open 816B — MI355X vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Muse Spark Open 816B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

At 197 tok/s/user on Muse Spark Open 816B, MI355X costs $0.03 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 costs $0.01. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 131% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

Vera Rubin NVL72 edges MI355X at 288 tok/s/user on Muse Spark Open 816B — $0.02 per million tokens versus $0.04, a 108% cost-per-token gap.

Push Muse Spark Open 816B to 379 tok/s/user and MI355X lands at $0.09 per million tokens against Vera Rubin NVL72's $0.02 — Vera Rubin NVL72 pulls ahead by 334%. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI355X $1.50/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Muse Spark Open 816B: MI355X versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI355X versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI355X:$0.028Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.012
MI355X:$0.035Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.017
MI355X:$0.094Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.022
Concurrency
MI355X:~10Vera Rubin NVL72:~47
MI355X:~12Vera Rubin NVL72:~30
MI355X:~4Vera Rubin NVL72:~24