Muse Spark Open 816B · Performance per Dollar

Muse Spark Open 816B — GB300 NVL72 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Muse Spark Open 816B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Push Muse Spark Open 816B to 259 tok/s/user and GB300 NVL72 lands at $0.03 per million tokens against Vera Rubin NVL72's $0.02 — Vera Rubin NVL72 pulls ahead by 123%.

GB300 NVL72: $0.08 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72: $0.02. Both at 411 tok/s/user on Muse Spark Open 816B, with Vera Rubin NVL72 215% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 107–714 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 562 tok/s/user — GB300 NVL72 runs $0.14 per million tokens on Muse Spark Open 816B while Vera Rubin NVL72 runs $0.04. Vera Rubin NVL72 is the cheaper choice by 280%. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB300 NVL72 $2.31/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Muse Spark Open 816B: GB300 NVL72 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB300 NVL72 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB300 NVL72:$0.035Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.016
GB300 NVL72:$0.077Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.024
GB300 NVL72:$0.140Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.037
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~12Vera Rubin NVL72:~35
GB300 NVL72:~9Vera Rubin NVL72:~39
GB300 NVL72:~1Vera Rubin NVL72:~100