Muse Spark Open 816B · Performance per Dollar

Muse Spark Open 816B — B200 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Muse Spark Open 816B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

On Muse Spark Open 816B at 193 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.03 for B200 and $0.01 for Vera Rubin NVL72; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 128% more total tokens per dollar.

At 280 tok/s/user on Muse Spark Open 816B, B200 costs $0.05 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 costs $0.02. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 175% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

Vera Rubin NVL72 edges B200 at 366 tok/s/user on Muse Spark Open 816B — $0.02 per million tokens versus $0.11, a 426% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.73/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Muse Spark Open 816B: B200 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.027Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.012
B200:$0.046Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.017
B200:$0.110Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.021
Concurrency
B200:~11Vera Rubin NVL72:~48
B200:~10Vera Rubin NVL72:~32
B200:~4Vera Rubin NVL72:~24