MiniMax M3 428B · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M3 428B — B200 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on MiniMax M3 428B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push MiniMax M3 428B to 18 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.23 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.18 — MI355X pulls ahead by 28%.

B200: $0.27 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.21. Both at 27 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B, with MI355X 31% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 9–46 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 37 tok/s/user — B200 runs $0.33 per million tokens on MiniMax M3 428B while MI355X runs $0.28. MI355X is the cheaper choice by 19%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M3 428B: B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.227MI355X:$0.177
B200:$0.274MI355X:$0.209
B200:$0.335MI355X:$0.281
Concurrency
B200:~256MI355X:~294
B200:~168MI355X:~158
B200:~87MI355X:~97

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.