MiniMax M3 428B · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M3 428B — B200 vs H200 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on MiniMax M3 428B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

On MiniMax M3 428B at 56 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.57 for B200 and $0.43 for H200; H200 delivers 31% more output per dollar.

At 103 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B, B200 costs $1.57 per million tokens; H200 costs $0.77. H200 is 105% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

H200 edges B200 at 151 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B — $1.15 per million tokens versus $4.32, a 274% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · H200 $1.41/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M3 428B: B200 versus H200 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus H200 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.567H200:$0.433
B200:$1.572H200:$0.767
B200:$4.315H200:$1.153
Concurrency
B200:~40H200:~35
B200:~8H200:~11
B200:~4H200:~4

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.