MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — B300 vs MI325X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 edges MI325X at 46 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — $0.13 per million tokens versus $0.22, a 68% cost-per-token gap.

Push MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 to 65 tok/s/user and B300 lands at $0.24 per million tokens against MI325X's $0.48 — B300 pulls ahead by 100%.

B300: $0.47 per million tokens. MI325X: $1.09. Both at 85 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, with B300 132% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.34/GPU/hr · MI325X $1.28/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: B300 versus MI325X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus MI325X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.129MI325X:$0.217
B300:$0.240MI325X:$0.479
B300:$0.472MI325X:$1.094
Concurrency
B300:~455MI325X:~147
B300:~101MI325X:~38
B300:~34MI325X:~16

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.