Llama 3.3 70B · Performance per Dollar

Llama 3.3 70B — MI300X vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Llama 3.3 70B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push Llama 3.3 70B to 53 tok/s/user and MI300X lands at $0.26 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.18 — MI355X pulls ahead by 43%.

MI300X: $0.48 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.25. Both at 73 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B, with MI355X 91% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 34–112 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 93 tok/s/user — MI300X runs $0.83 per million tokens on Llama 3.3 70B while MI355X runs $0.46. MI355X is the cheaper choice by 79%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$0.257MI355X:$0.179
MI300X:$0.479MI355X:$0.251
MI300X:$0.832MI355X:$0.464
Concurrency
MI300X:~50MI355X:~47
MI300X:~32MI355X:~51
MI300X:~17MI355X:~19

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.