Llama 3.3 70B · Performance per Dollar

Llama 3.3 70B — MI300X vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Llama 3.3 70B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push Llama 3.3 70B to 53 tok/s/user and MI300X lands at $0.26 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.18 — MI355X pulls ahead by 43%.

MI300X: $0.48 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.25. Both at 73 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B, with MI355X 91% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 34–112 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 93 tok/s/user — MI300X runs $0.83 per million tokens on Llama 3.3 70B while MI355X runs $0.46. MI355X is the cheaper choice by 79%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Llama 3.3 70B: MI300X versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI300X versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$0.257MI355X:$0.179
MI300X:$0.479MI355X:$0.251
MI300X:$0.832MI355X:$0.464
Concurrency
MI300X:~50MI355X:~47
MI300X:~32MI355X:~51
MI300X:~17MI355X:~19

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.