Llama 3.3 70B · Performance per Dollar

Llama 3.3 70B — MI300X vs MI325X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on Llama 3.3 70B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

On Llama 3.3 70B at 48 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.24 for MI300X and $0.22 for MI325X; MI325X delivers 11% more output per dollar.

At 69 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B, MI300X costs $0.41 per million tokens; MI325X costs $0.37. MI325X is 12% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

MI325X edges MI300X at 91 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B — $0.62 per million tokens versus $0.77, a 25% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr · MI325X $1.28/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Llama 3.3 70B: MI300X versus MI325X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI300X versus MI325X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$0.239MI325X:$0.215
MI300X:$0.410MI325X:$0.366
MI300X:$0.771MI325X:$0.618
Concurrency
MI300X:~61MI325X:~62
MI300X:~32MI325X:~63
MI300X:~18MI325X:~26

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.